From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-08 14:20:07
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> 2. I strongly urge that you review the conventions used for
> interoperability with the MPL's idioms.
And I second the use of MPL conventions. I would fully
expect FC++ to interoperate with MPL where it is easy for
it to do so. Failure to interoperate only because of naming
differences would be most unfortunate.
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk