Re: [boost] Re: unions

From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-08 16:44:19

--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> 
> Please consult any basic textbook on algorithm complexity.  No offense
> intended, but if we can't agree on O(N) == O(k * N), I think we'll
> never agree on anything and I don't see any point in continuing this
> conversation.

Of course I are right, I was just teasing sorry.
You were paranoid about me using word "behavior"
I was paranoid about 'k'; technically you should 
have said that k is *independent* of N.
I liked your "o-n-squared-equals-o-one-ly" proof though.

I think you and I agree that variant 
should not have a special "first-type switch"?

Eugene

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com