From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-08 20:00:48
--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I thought that you have been arguing that it is not
> > easy to add empty_type especially in generic context?
> No, I've been saying that if you add empty_type to types (A,B,C), you
> lose the valuable invariant that the variant always contains one of
> (A,B,C). The invariant becomes that it contains one of
> (A,B,C,empty_type). Your code now has to account for that case, and
> may have to include new cases which fail at runtime. Consider
I agree with that. So what is the conclusion?
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk