From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-09 11:51:25
--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It isn't a question of "singular variants vs. basic guarantees".
> Nobody's going to give up the basic guarantee. Either we're going to
> change the invariant of the class to accomodate singularity, thus
> preserving the basic guarantee, or we're not going to have
If you allow singular variants, you don't need to provide
basic guarantess (the way they are spelled out now in variant)
in variant anymore.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk