RE: [boost] Re: Variant implementation change (was re: unions)

From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-09 12:27:18

--- Brock Peabody <brock.peabody_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> 
> Imagine, for instance, that boost::variant ignored exceptions during
> assignment - it stops making the basic guarantee.  Can you see that the
> destructor for boost::variant will enter undefined territory?
> 

No, you don't ignore it you delete the contained object
and set the variant's state to singular.  Don't see
any problems here.

Eugene

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com