From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-09 15:03:47
--- Brock Peabody <brock.peabody_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> > On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
> > > (6) You can get the behavior in (4) by specifying boost::empty as one of
> > the
> > > possible types in variant. Can't argue with that.
> > Not true. variant< my_type, empty > technically variant
> > can reinitialize (in case of an exception) my_type, not 'empty'.
> > It is not the same as singular variant. That is _fact_.
> OK, reword (6) to be: "You can get the behavior in (4) by specifying
> boost::empty as the first type in a variant".
Here we go again, Brock. It has alredy been discussed that it
is not a good generic solution to assign a special meaning to the first type.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk