From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-10 11:58:57
Glen Knowles wrote:
> I write a lot of those little for loops (one of my "choosen" compilers
> is HP aC++, no lamda, flaky bind, etc, yuck) and I would definitely use
> the macro.
I use bcc 5.6.4 and can use bind but not lambda but have just started
using phoenix for simple constructs e.g.
phoenix::arg1 = phoenix::arg1 * -1.0);
I'm unsure about the macro. I haven't looked at the
container_traits/sequence_algo mentioned elsewhere in this thread yet.
Its an interesting idea, and I would possibly use it were it accepted
One thing that worries me about the inital example is if you forget to
declare i as a reference, then it breaks.
Could the type of the local not be auto-declared? so it becomes
That way, the user doesn't have to remember the & or not.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk