From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-11 03:51:48
--- Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I guess if it weren't special, it won't get the qualification
> "singular" or "unspecified value".
There is no such a thing as "qualification". Both are just
instances of a data type.
> if they care, then they care about the arguments they get, especially
> about the singular ones. Their functions aren't going to be safe just
> because they refuse to recognize that some arguments are singular.
I am sorry, I said that "If any of these can happen,
he should handle it in his f() function".
I meant that f(...) *has* to recognize 'singular' arguments.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk