From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-11 13:10:03
--- Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> That is unsufficient. For example, initialized objects and
> non-initialized ones don't behave the same way. Unintialized objects
> are kind of singular. The same holds for objects whose storage has
> been reused.
So is it possible at all to implement a variant that *always* has
one of the user specified types?
It seems that during assignment and intialization,
variant will have to be in some singular state anyway.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk