Re: [boost] Singular variants?

From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-11 13:10:03

--- Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> 
> That is unsufficient.  For example, initialized objects and
> non-initialized ones don't behave the same way.  Unintialized objects
> are kind of singular.  The same holds for objects whose  storage has
> been reused. 
> 

I agree.
So is it possible at all to implement a variant that *always* has
one of the user specified types?
It seems that during assignment and intialization,
variant will have to be in some singular state anyway.

Eugene

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com