Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-27 15:54:26

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Divergent Paths in Boost? (Was: Re: string algorithms review)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [policy_ptr]"
In reply to: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"
Next in thread: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"
Reply: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"

Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Why not just specialize find_nth() for 0 so it does not compile?

Because N might be a non-constant expression.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Divergent Paths in Boost? (Was: Re: string algorithms review)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [policy_ptr]"
In reply to: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"
Next in thread: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"
Reply: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [string algo formal review]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk