From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-28 14:26:49
"E. Gladyshev" <egladysh_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> --- Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > How about not requiring a visitor overload for boost::empty?
> Sorry, I am not sure I understand.
> Could you give some more details... piece of code?
What I meant is to change variant so as to treat boost::empty specially and,
for instance, never visit it.
>From the user POV, this amounts to loose the requirement that the visitor
must handle 'empty' as a visiting type.
Now, I do remember that this was originially a choice but it turned out that
instructing variant to have special knowldege of such a singular type was
very complex. I'm just suggesting that however complex it might be, seems to
solve some of this issues.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk