From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-28 16:55:17
--- Eric Friedman <ebf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I do agree, however, that the need to explicitly handle boost::empty in
> visitors does somewhat complicate the use of boost::empty as an
> optimization. Perhaps the cannot_visit class I proposed elsewhere in
> this thread is a good solution.
> I'm open to suggestions.
Just wanted to add to my prev posting.
I think cannot_visit should be available in apply_visitor as well.
apply_visitor< cannont_visit<type1>, cannont_visit<type2> >(v);
It'll give a finer visitation control at the
invocation time in addition to the declaration time.
Eric, any chance to get in v1.31?
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk