Boost logo

Boost :

From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-30 05:21:48


Surely any string compatible stuff should use

std::basic_string <char>::size_type size_type

for std:: consistency at least.

Which answers any questions on the current string algorithm review.

(And in general, my experience -I never ignore signed/unsigned mismatch
warnings - suggests that using unsigned for the never negative is the Right
Thing To Do. But it is tiresome at first.)

Paul

Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
mailto:pbristow_at_[hidden]

| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Thorsten Ottosen
| Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:25 AM
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: [boost] Re: int vs. unsigned int


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk