|
|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-30 15:08:08
Jessie Hernandez wrote:
[...]
> The above hierarchy, I think, is the best of both worlds: you have a
> minimal number of exception classes covering broad types of errors.
But _why_ is having a minimal number of exception classes a virtue?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk