From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-01 01:47:51
Eric Friedman <ebf_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 's a bug.
> Well, technically it's not a bug: variant<> *is* variant<boost::empty>.
> I agree this may be unexpected, and so should probably be noted more
> explicitly in the docs.
> Also, we _can_ argue whether this unexpectedness constitutes a bug in
> variant's design. (It's certainly not an *implementation* bug though.)
OK, I take it back.
'snot a bug ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk