From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-03 05:03:34
New license sucks. Pathetic example of NIH syndrome.
Jaap Suter wrote:
> the implementation. For example, anybody implementing the scoped_ptr
> interface will pretty much end up with code the same as in the Boost
> library, perhaps minus the portability workarounds. What does this mean for
> the copyright of the original Boost scoped_ptr, especially considering that
> anybody implementing its own scoped_ptr will probably have heard of Boost
> and possibly even have looked at it.
-- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/pthreads-win32/2003/msg00110.html (Subject: changing pthreads-win32 license)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk