Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-03 05:03:34

New license sucks. Pathetic example of NIH syndrome.

Jaap Suter wrote:
> the implementation. For example, anybody implementing the scoped_ptr
> interface will pretty much end up with code the same as in the Boost
> library, perhaps minus the portability workarounds. What does this mean for
> the copyright of the original Boost scoped_ptr, especially considering that
> anybody implementing its own scoped_ptr will probably have heard of Boost
> and possibly even have looked at it.


(Subject: changing pthreads-win32 license)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at