From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-05 06:04:27
> >Do we want to ensure that?
Personally I think yes - it makes life a lot easier if you want to provide
makefiles and the like.
> Now *that's* a good question ;-) Being consistent means less explaining we
> have to do for some users. But at the same time it's more explaining to
> users who don't expect it.
> So the even better question... What are the expections for a static
> name on Windows??
> By the way the lib prefix is required in pratically all Unix/Linux/BSD
Yes, and for gcc on *Windows* as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk