[boost] Re: alternative thread_specific_ptr idea

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-11 08:58:00

Martin Wille wrote:
[...]
> A downside of this approach is that operator->(),
> operator*() and .reset(p) (for p!=0) for this
> implementation could throw (due the underlying vector
> failing to be expanded). However, .get(), .release(),
> .reset(0) and the dtor could be made nothrow.

.reset(0) is aka .dispose() and it has throw()-nothing 
ES. operator->() and operator*() shall simply assert() 
on .get() and also be nothrow. Oder? You might want to 
take a look at:

<http://tinyurl.com/uj61> -> <http://tinyurl.com/uj5x> 

regards,
alexander.

--
www.google.com/groups?selm=3F72E463.6CB205A8%40web.de