|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-15 18:33:10
Mat Marcus <mat-boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The current proposals address this, but as I mentioned earlier
> there was some pushback from the compiler vendors leading to at least
> one workaround proposal that in my mind resembles named conformance.
Really??! I thought the big problem they had was with structural
conformance (?)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk