From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-18 08:26:06
Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I'd welcome naming suggestions, "alternative_thread_specific_ptr"
>> is a bit unwieldy.
>> Is there interest to make alternative_thread_specific_ptr<>
>> a part of Boost.Thread? If so, what would be the procedure
>> (it is a small addition to an existing library, so I don't
>> know wether a formal review is required)?
'fcourse you know I'm interested. As before, we can always use
Spirit as the test-bed before the code migrates to its actual destination.
We need the feature and we need it now ;)
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk