|
Boost : |
From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-18 18:49:39
> Weirdly, the numbered form ('list0...n') seem to be fine:
>
> int main()
> {
> typedef begin< list1<int> >::type t;
> typedef lambda< list1<int> >::type l;
> ^^^^^
> }
>
> I might get to the root of it and provide a workaround in the core of
> the
> library, but it definitely looks like a nasty one.
> Meanwhile, I suggest you to switch to using numbered lists/vectors.
Hmmm...changing over to numbered lists gives me a new and different
compiler crash - not exactly an improvement, but I guess it's
technically
progress... I'm curious if anyone out there has a version of CW9 to try
the code out on...
> Not necessarily useless. I wouldn't be surprised if CW9 still has it.
I suppose the downside of using cutting edge stuff like MPL is that it
produces code at the outer limits of the compiler capability. Anyway,
great work on putting it together : I wouldn't have even contemplated
the dimensional analysis code without it...
Matthias
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Matthias Schabel, Ph.D.
Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research
729 Arapeen Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84108
801-587-9413 (work)
801-585-3592 (fax)
801-706-5760 (cell)
801-484-0811 (home)
mschabel at ucair med utah edu
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk