From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-19 04:26:43
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 03:59 AM 11/18/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Do we need a different test? Was this added for intel/Linux?
> No, Win32. It was odd, IIRC, in that the change caused
> is_convertible_test to fail, but without the change perhaps a
> half-dozen other tests failed.
> I think I mentioned it at the time, but don't remember getting any
I'd like to know more about what was failing without it, because the
patch is breaking code which I need to work.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk