[boost] Re: have there been some major changes in iterator_adaptor?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-20 17:28:58

Matthias Schabel <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I used to have this code, which worked fine, now it seems broken...
>
> typedef
> boost::iterator_adaptor<pointer,boost::default_iterator_policies>
> iterator;
> typedef
> boost::iterator_adaptor<const_pointer,boost::default_iterator_policies>
> const_iterator;
> typedef typename boost::reverse_iterator_generator<iterator>::type
> reverse_iterator;
> typedef typename
> boost::reverse_iterator_generator<const_iterator>::type
> const_reverse_iterator;
>
> is there something going on with the iterator adaptors in the
> pre-release code base?

Yes, bigtime:

  http://www.boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/iterator/doc/index.html

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com