|
Boost : |
From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-25 05:36:49
Hi!
I am wading through the docs for library submitters
trying to find my way through the formal aspects of
proposing boost::etl (a redesigned version of Daixtrose).
Actually many points are clear and easy to follow,
but some remain that I'd like to have some help with:
While boost only requires
"The format for documentation should be HTML"
there is some more recommendation I'd like to follow,
especially the stuff below
http://www.boost.org/more/writingdoc/index.html
My question: is there an easy way to achieve
an approximately conformant way to build the
docs _easily_?
Which tools or toolchain do you use, such that you
do not have to worry about formatting issues too much?
Is there a doxygen-based solution?
boost::spirit docs were made out of a wiki, which is
a very attractive approach, too, since it can grow slowly.
Which tools do you recommend?
Which pages at boost have I overlooked?
I am sitting in front of a linux box, so the
choices are pretty large. Any guide appreciated.
best regards,
Markus
P.S.: Not much hope, but: anyone with a tool which
"boostifies" source code such that it supports
the naming convention? SomeThing that changes to some_thing
and makes all template args Uppercase, etc ...
-- Build your own Expression Template Library with Daixtrose! Visit http://daixtrose.sourceforge.net/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk