Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-30 07:44:43


"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> The one config failure:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/wuoh#limits_test-intel-win32-7.1-vc6-stlport-4.5.3
>>
>> Is as a result of the fact that this compiler configuration has an
>> intrinsic wchar_t but that the version of STLPort doesn't supply a
>> specialization for it.
>>
>> How should we address this problem?
>
> File a bug report to the STLPort guys?
>
> Seriously is this our problem? I appreciate it's annoying to have a "broken"
> flag for that when it's beyond our control however...

The problem is that we have tests which fail because of it. I
adjusted counting_iterator to supply a specialization for
is_numeric<wchar_t>, which was previously looking at
numeric_limits<wchar_t>::is_specialized.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk