[boost] Re: Expected Errors?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-03 07:35:41

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 09:10 PM 12/1/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
>  >At 11:41 AM 12/1/2003, Misha Bergal wrote:
>  >
>  > >The process_jam_log doesn't distinguish between the tests with the
>  > >same name but different libs (for example, "list" test is in the mpl
>  > >and python libs) and assigns all "list" test results to mpl).  Calling
>  > >"conf. problem" is probably wrong, but in any case if root of the
>  > >problem is fixed then it is going to go away. The same is with
>  > >"missing" test results in Boost.Python.
>  >
>  >This is supposed to be working properly now. If you are still having
>  >problems, let me know.
>
> I made some further improvements and bug fixes to compiler_status.cpp
> this morning. Thanks to John Maddock for bug reports. The library name
> is now part of the heading for each test in the detailed "fail"
> reports.

A nit:

The ordering "lib, testname, toolset"  seems mixed up because it
doesn't monotically increase or decrease in specificity.  I'd do 

  testname, lib, toolset

(or the reverse)

FWIW.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com