From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-03 07:35:41
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 09:10 PM 12/1/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
> >At 11:41 AM 12/1/2003, Misha Bergal wrote:
> > >The process_jam_log doesn't distinguish between the tests with the
> > >same name but different libs (for example, "list" test is in the mpl
> > >and python libs) and assigns all "list" test results to mpl). Calling
> > >"conf. problem" is probably wrong, but in any case if root of the
> > >problem is fixed then it is going to go away. The same is with
> > >"missing" test results in Boost.Python.
> >This is supposed to be working properly now. If you are still having
> >problems, let me know.
> I made some further improvements and bug fixes to compiler_status.cpp
> this morning. Thanks to John Maddock for bug reports. The library name
> is now part of the heading for each test in the detailed "fail"
The ordering "lib, testname, toolset" seems mixed up because it
doesn't monotically increase or decrease in specificity. I'd do
testname, lib, toolset
(or the reverse)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk