Boost logo

Boost :

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-07 23:08:24

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> I'm picking through the Win32 regression test results to see where
> we stand. Here are some concerns I have (on a per-library basis):


> MPL: Untested (?)

Tested by us -

> Multi-array: Totally broken on Borland; I think we can work around
> this, though.
> numeric/interval: Broken on Borland (looks like a standard library
> bug); Broken on MSVC 6.0 (looks like it thinks float/double are
> equivalent?)
> numeric/ublas: Failures on CodeWarrior 8.3; I _think_ that the line
> it's pointing out is missing a "typename" (there are other
> occurrences of the same construct).
> regex: Library build failure on CodeWarrior 8.3
> spirit: Untested (?)

Tested by us -

> type_traits:
> alignment_of_test/type_with_alignment_test on CodeWarrior 8.3: I
> can't make heads or tails of this. We compute the alignment of a
> pointer-to-member function one way and get 8; then compute it a
> different way and get 12. I haven't a clue which is right, but
> this is _strange_.
> remove_xxx: Borland fails most of these; is this a compiler
> limitation? MSVC 6.0 and 7.0 fail all of them (no partial
> specialization support), so I've noted this in win32-notes-map.txt.
> utility: enable_if_* tests fail on Borland, CW 8.3, MSVC 6.0, and
> MSVC 7.0; I've noted that they're all due to compiler bugs.
> In a perfect world, I'd love to see all of the tests either passing
> or noted as a compiler/platform/standard library bug for a release.

That was the release criteria for 1.30.2 (for major platforms we agreed


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at