Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 01:11:39

Next message: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: A better tokenizer?"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] typos in serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
In reply to: Eric Boutin: "[boost] boost::config BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM would be nice"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] boost::config BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM would be nice"

"Eric Boutin" <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote in message:

> therefore, it would be nice to have a macro BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM to know if
we

Boost already has a macro for BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM, but the discussion policy
on third-party attacks forbids me from saying which one it is. ;-)

Jonathan

Next message: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: A better tokenizer?"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] typos in serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
In reply to: Eric Boutin: "[boost] boost::config BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM would be nice"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] boost::config BOOST_BUGGY_SYSTEM would be nice"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk