[boost] Re: The wonders of shared_ptr

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-11 12:31:57

Rani Sharoni wrote:
[...]
> Sorry but I personally can't program with lock that might fail and handle
> the failure. This will definitely change the non failure guarantee of many
> functions/scopes such as cleanup functions and non-mutating functions. Sure
> that there are cases in which the lock will not change the failure guaranty.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3FA61F96.223FDE85%40web.de

[...]
> > shared_ptr, i.e. a programming error.
> 
> I'm surprised to see  [... "to throw or not to throw" ...]

He he. (Never mind ;-) )

regards,
alexander.