From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-11 12:31:57
Rani Sharoni wrote:
> Sorry but I personally can't program with lock that might fail and handle
> the failure. This will definitely change the non failure guarantee of many
> functions/scopes such as cleanup functions and non-mutating functions. Sure
> that there are cases in which the lock will not change the failure guaranty.
> > shared_ptr, i.e. a programming error.
> I'm surprised to see [... "to throw or not to throw" ...]
He he. (Never mind ;-) )
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk