Re: [boost] Re: BGL ported to C#

From: Jonathan de Halleux (dehalleux_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-13 07:05:01

Good point. There are a number of reasons for not using the MC++ solution.

1) MC++ is not elegant, really not fun write. This the major reason. For 
instance, create a MC++ assembly with the BGL and open it in the Object 
explorer of VS: it is full of classes that you don't want to be there!

2) I wanted a 100% C# solution (this is related to (1) ).

:)

At 17:56 12/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Jonathan de Halleux wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > (This thread is a bit out of topic since boost is a C++ library but
> > it is worth to mention. If you have nothing to do with C#, please do
> > not mind
> > this post)
> >
> > The QuickGraph library is an attempt to port the BGL library to C#.
> > It has now reached a stable form and therefore I am sending this mail
> > to the BGL
> > C++ users.
>
>Surprised you didn't try to port it to MC++. It might have been easier.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: 
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan de Halleux, Research Assistant
Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics (CESAME)
Universite catholique de Louvain
Batiment Euler , Av. Georges Lemaitre, 4 Tel : [phone]
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium
E-mail : dehalleux_at_[hidden]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------