From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-17 08:20:12
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2003, at 8:45 AM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>> What I'm really interested in doing, however, is getting the
>> rw_mutex and
>> related classes that are in the thread_dev branch into releasable
>> shape and
>> then getting them into a release; I think I can do this because I use
>> and have invested a lot of time in understanding, cleaning up, and
>> improving them (though my changes are not in CVS and haven't even been
>> posted yet).
> Fwiw, I took a look at the rw_mutex about five months ago and posted this:
> And after a little further reflection posted:
> I've since settled on the name lock_both instead of lock2 as proposed
> in my second post.
I've looked at both of the links above and find your suggestions
interesting. I'll definitely consider them when I get around to the
rw_mutex stuff; I'm sure you'll hear more from me then.
> I can contribute interface suggestions, but not implementation.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk