RE: [boost] & Borland (slightly OT)

From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-18 09:54:47

LOL at Verity Stob, Dr Dobb;s Journal, Jan 2004, vol 356, p 14 (www.ddj.com)

where Boost gets a (brief) mention  "It's called C++BuilderX ... got a new ANSI
compiler that copes with Boost"

Say no more...

Paul

Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB  UK
[phone]   Mobile [phone]
mailto:pbristow_at_[hidden]

| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Beman Dawes
| Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:13 PM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: RE: [boost] Re: transform_iterator_test failing on VC 7.1
|
|
| At 06:04 AM 12/15/2003, Drazen DOTLIC wrote:
|
|  >> > It was working before, then something went in that fixed a
|  >> few other compilers
|  >> > and broken VC 7.1.
|  >>
|  >> Worked around now; bug reported, too.
|  >
|  >Slightly OT, but - how did you report the bug, assuming it was MS you
|  >reported it to? I've seen several ICE and other problems that are
|  >relatively easy to reproduce, and would like to report them... Problems
|  >were not in boost btw, but in our code (which does use boost, of course
|  >;))
|
| Postings to microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc (available via news reader
| or Google Groups) are monitored closely by several key MS VC++ developers
| knowledgeable about Boost. That's a good start.
|
| --Beman
|
| _______________________________________________
| Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
|
|