From: Edward Diener (eddielee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-25 08:49:58
Bo Persson wrote:
> "Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> skrev i meddelandet
>> I think the notation for 'const', before or after the main type
>> itself in
>> type expression, should be consistent in all documentation. I admit
>> I have been swayed by the argument of Josuttis and Vandevoorde in
>> their C++ Templates book to put it after the main type, since this
>> follows the general rule that 'const' always goes after the type it
>> is modifying.
> A counter argument is of course that the Standard Document itself
> uses the opposite convention.
> Maybe this is a good season for a religious debate? :-)
I was arguing for consistency in the Boost documentation, not whether one
notation is better than another. I do see your smiley, however.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk