[boost] Re: Branch for release?

From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-27 21:05:12

[David Abrahams]

> It also seems cruel to require that people upgrade
> needlessly.  Lots of people probably have a version that
> already works.  BTW, I never suggested requiring 3.2; only
> noting that there are problems with 3.2.3.

It should be noted that gcc 3.2 is horribly broken: if you try to
range-construct an empty string, the program segfaults.

This may not count as "horribly broken" to you, of course.  ^_^

Stephan T. Lavavej
http://nuwen.net