From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-27 21:05:12
> It also seems cruel to require that people upgrade
> needlessly. Lots of people probably have a version that
> already works. BTW, I never suggested requiring 3.2; only
> noting that there are problems with 3.2.3.
It should be noted that gcc 3.2 is horribly broken: if you try to
range-construct an empty string, the program segfaults.
This may not count as "horribly broken" to you, of course. ^_^
Stephan T. Lavavej
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk