From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-29 15:41:55
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> All of that is perhaps interesting, but it is really off-topic for Boost.
> So this discussion should move to comp.lang.c++.moderated, or
> perhaps some forum dealing with copyright law.
So basically, you don't think there's any merit to the claims?
You don't suppose a nightmare scenario in which the actual
language itself turns out to be owned by SCO, and all "derivative
works", like Boost, also turn out to be owned by SCO is remotely
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 12/26/2003
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk