From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-03 06:04:25
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I really don't understand why correctness should
> not be the default and then let those who want it do the hacks?
But const-correctness *is* the default, as long as you do it
> Maybe, my though was that your pointer was partially specialized
> for const T to be const-correct; you might have thought of it as the
> normal style :-).
It doesn't need to be partially specialized. When you use T const,
then pointer_type == T const*, which is what operator->() will return.
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 12/26/2003
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk