|
|
Boost : |
From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard (jbms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-04 20:04:07
As far as iterator invalidation, under a common implementation of the
proposal (and under mine), iterators are not invalidated. It is also
quite convenient for iterators not to be invalidated. I think that the
benefit of iterators not being invalidated outweighs the cost of
requiring a particular implementation of iterators.
-- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk