From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 03:25:30
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> But the deep const that Thorsten wants
> is fundamentally different, since it doesn't just propagate to
> members, which is what const already does.
Just to make it clear, I have never wanted that at the language level.
Having both posibilities
seems to give the greatest flexibility for most people. I did want smart
pointers to pursue constness.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk