[boost] Re: Interest in smart pointer with value semantics?

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 03:25:30

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:btb173$cge$1_at_sea.gmane.org...

> But the deep const that Thorsten wants
> is fundamentally different, since it doesn't just propagate to
> members, which is what const already does.

Just to make it clear, I have never wanted that at the language level.
Having both posibilities
seems to give the greatest flexibility for most people. I did want smart
pointers to pursue constness.

br

Thorsten