[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!

From: Dan W. (danw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 12:33:21

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Dan W." <danw_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>I dare anyone to actually try it, and *then* tell me that it's no
>>better than assert()...
> 
> 
> On Windows, in a debug build with bjam:
> 
> msvc 6,7,7.1: won't compile
> codewarrior pro8: debug/cancel dialog
> intel 5,6,7,8: debug/cancel dialog
> Cygwin gcc 3.3.1, 2.95.3: runs to completion and returns 0
> MinGW gcc 3.2: runs to completion and returns 0
> borland 5.5.1, 5.6.4: runs to completion and returns 0
> 
> When I uncomment the assert, codewarrior gives me a slightly more
> informative dialog and borland and gcc both print useful information
> to the console.
> 
> I think I'll stick with assert ;-)
> 

WOW!

Thanks.

(Back to the drawing board.)