Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 13:28:36

Next message: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: [ANN] New Version (V1.0.0) of the Wave preprocessor library released"
Previous message: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: Interest in smart pointer with value semantics?"
In reply to: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"
Next in thread: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"
Reply: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"

"Dan W." <danw_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:btbilf$8lh$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> [...]
> asm int 3
> [...]

What about platforms that don't have this instruction, or for
which this instruction means something different than on
IA-32?

Dave

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 12/26/2003

Next message: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: [ANN] New Version (V1.0.0) of the Wave preprocessor library released"
Previous message: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: Interest in smart pointer with value semantics?"
In reply to: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"
Next in thread: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"
Reply: Dan W.: "[boost] Re: A better assert() This is it!!!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk