Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes (larsbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-07 05:04:21

Next message: Andy Little: "[boost] Re: physical quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
Previous message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: physical quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"
Next in thread: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"
Reply: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Probably can't get any better on BCB.
>
| Actually, you probably can't get much better on any compiler, for
| reasons listed in one of the threads on SmartPtr, and mentioned
| in Andrei's & my Oct '03 CUJ article.

Gcc says size is 4, or are you talking of something differnt?

-- 
	Lgb

Next message: Andy Little: "[boost] Re: physical quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
Previous message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: physical quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"
Next in thread: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"
Reply: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [noncopyable.hpp] small fix for Borland"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk