Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Deane Yang (deane_yang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-07 19:05:07

Next message: Matthias Schabel: "Re: [boost] Re: physical-quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
Previous message: Hurd, Matthew: "RE: [boost] Re: "invariants" class; Version 1.00"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"
Next in thread: Phil Richards: "Re: [boost] Re: Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"
Reply: Phil Richards: "Re: [boost] Re: Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"

Paul A. Bristow wrote:

> My guess is that at least 90% of applications will use only SI units.
>

If the library is designed specifically for physical dimensions,
I agree.
If the library is designed for user-defined units or dimensions,
I disagree.

Next message: Matthias Schabel: "Re: [boost] Re: physical-quantities (was: runtime unit-modifiable ...)"
Previous message: Hurd, Matthew: "RE: [boost] Re: "invariants" class; Version 1.00"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"
Next in thread: Phil Richards: "Re: [boost] Re: Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"
Reply: Phil Richards: "Re: [boost] Re: Physical quantities (was Re: runtime unit-modifiablephysical-quantitiesusingpqs1-00-01)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk