Re: [boost] Re: "invariants" class; Version 1.02

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-10 21:02:11

Dan W. wrote:
> Daniel Wallin wrote:
> 
>> Well, I think it's kind of disturbing to use a macro to declare the
>> check_invariants() function. If the compiler can't manage the lifetime
>> of temporaries I think you should file a bug report, not work around it
>> with macros that propagate to user code.
> 
> 
> I filed a bug report. As for the macro, it was kind of needed anyways.

Really? I'm referring to the INVARIANTS() macro, which wasn't needed in
my code.

-- 
Daniel Wallin