[boost] Re: RC_1_31_0 badly broken

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-11 11:53:32

"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:

> --- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>> > The latest RC_1_31_0 CVS is badly broken. See below. It is the same on all
>> Unix
>> > platforms. I am surprised to see mixed-case identifiers. Shouldn't they be
>> all
>> > lower-case in Boost libraries?
>> > The candidate was still healthy on all platforms two days ago. The log from
>> the
>> > CVS update that broke all Unix builds can be found here:
>> >
>> > http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/cvs_update_that_broke_everything
>> >
>> > The full extend of the damage can be viewed here:
>> >
>> >
>>
> http://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/show_error_summary.cgi?build_tag=2004_01_10_1817
>> 
>> Well, I think you could've fixed this one yourself... but it's fixed
>> now.
>
> I would have fixed it myself if there wasn't the mixed-case is_POD in the code.
> What about that question?

What's the question?

THat's the name of the trait IIUC.  It certainly compiles everywhere,
unless my compilers have suddenly become case-insensitive.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com