Boost logo

Boost :

From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-11 15:22:06


Is there any reason, why there is no default constructor provided for date classes in
the date_time library?
I seems to me, that it would be quite reasonable to provide it, while intializing
the object to not_a_date_time. Current implementatio seems to be unreasonably restrictive.

The other issue is, if there is a plan to add unicode support to the library.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at