From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-11 15:22:06
Is there any reason, why there is no default constructor provided for date classes in
the date_time library?
I seems to me, that it would be quite reasonable to provide it, while intializing
the object to not_a_date_time. Current implementatio seems to be unreasonably restrictive.
The other issue is, if there is a plan to add unicode support to the library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk