Boost logo

Boost :

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-12 14:17:13

Roland wrote:
> An other possible solution would be to reconsider my version that can
> do without an explicit DLL. (Michael Glassford, are you listening?
> Refactoring
> the thread monitor still necessary.)

As I mentioned before, I'm always listening.

I'm also very interested in the static/dynamic linking issue and in looking
at your pseudo-dll approach, but I have other Boost.Thread priorities to get
to first and, unfortunately, limited time for dealing with Boost.Thread.

Did you ever look into the issues you mentioned with your pseudo-dll (quoted
below from another thread)?

> I know that there are some things that will need more consideration.
> Robustness of temporary file path, possible race conditions,
> (or speed?) to name a few that come to mind. Also issues of putting
> the stub file compilation into bjam build is not yet obvious to me.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at