From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-18 21:01:54
David Abrahams wrote:
> At meta-comm there are results listed for "CVS RC_1_30_0 branch"
Just to clarify, they are results for the CVS RC_1_30_0 branch.
> Shouldn't that be "CVS RC_1_31_0 branch"?
Yes, it should be. The only thing that keeps us from running regressions on
RC_1_31_0 is that at the moment we don't have enough compilation resources
to be able to do that both for the branch and for the main trunk. It's going
to be there in a day or two.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk