Boost logo

Boost :

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-21 10:20:36

Daniel Wallin <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> ... which is more generic, and I like it :>>
> How is this more generic? Like Howard already stated, it's just an
> aesthetic advantage. Which, of course, is highly subjective. I'm not
> saying I don't agree that it looks better, I just want to keep the
> arguments for both ways sane.

Oopps, you are right. I was thinking about template specialization, but
there's no second template parameter to specialize with. Now I just do
not know how Howard wants to define both classes :/ (call me dumb)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at