[boost] Re: 1.31.0 release candidate available + release plans

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-22 13:25:44

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote

> > At least the compatibility headers should contain:
> >
> > #if (defined __BORLANDC__) && (__BORLANDC__ < 0x564)
> > #  error ... why and what to do now ...
> > #endif
> >
> > to avoid misunderstandings in the future.
>
> Why should we do that for old versions of Borland?
> What about other compilers?
>
Ugh, the story is:
- Serialization includes these headers
- they do work with BCB
- I'd like these be fixed but can find workaround
  within Serialization
- other unsuspecting people may include them
   so its nice to warn them ahead

But it is no showstopper for me and I don't care of it much.
I also have no clue about other compilers/stdlibs here.

/Pavel