From: Giovanni Bajo (giovannibajo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-23 05:16:04
Beman Dawes wrote:
> First, thanks for going to the trouble to figure this out. I expect
> it took you hours of work.
You're welcome. Boost saves me so much time in everyday development.
> Although it strikes me as fragile (future library change could cause
> failure), it looks like the best solution so far. Your comment in the
> patch is a bit wrong, in that it says "Intel C++ defines it to 1".
> You might change that to "Intel C++ defines it to 1 or 2" so that a reader
> understands why the equality tests don't just look for a 1.
Yes. The comment wasn't updated after I tested it with Intel C++ 8.0, I'll
surely fix it.
> Unless someone else objects, I think you should go ahead and commit
> the patch. Be aware CVS seems to be running very slowly.
I'll wait to clarify the issue with David as well.
-- Giovanni Bajo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk